Monday Night Raw - 23 de Outubro de 2017
FPW: Fórum de Pro Wrestling :: Wrestling :: WWE :: Shows :: Monday Night Raw
Monday Night Raw - 23 de Outubro de 2017
Depois do TLC deste Domingo, a WWE realiza esta Segunda-feira mais uma edição do Monday Night Raw. O caminho para o Survivor Series já começou e o destaque vai para Brock Lesnar, que vai responder ao desafio de Jinder Mahal.
Estes são todos os pontos que a companhia está a utilizar para promover o show:
– O WWE Universal Champion Brock Lesnar vai responder ao desafio do WWE Champion Jinder Mahal para um combate no Survivor Series;
– Alguma lutadora está preparada para a vinda de Asuka para o Raw?
– O que Kane terá a dizer sobre o ataque a Braun Strowman do TLC?
– Enzo Amore é novamente WWE Cruiserweight Champion… mas por quanto tempo?
– Depois do incrível Finn Bálor vs AJ Styles, o que se segue para o “Demon”?
Fonte: Wrestling.pt
Renato- Administrador
- Número de Mensagens : 29398
Idade : 28
Localização : Somewhere over the rainbow
Emprego/lazer : Estudante
Data de inscrição : 28/12/2008
Renato- Administrador
- Número de Mensagens : 29398
Idade : 28
Localização : Somewhere over the rainbow
Emprego/lazer : Estudante
Data de inscrição : 28/12/2008
Re: Monday Night Raw - 23 de Outubro de 2017
Chó- FPW Hall Of Famer
- Número de Mensagens : 37579
Localização : Eu moro em Portugal
Emprego/lazer : Com a crise é impossível ter emprego --'
Data de inscrição : 24/05/2009
Re: Monday Night Raw - 23 de Outubro de 2017
O Raw sempre foi visto como o mau da fita na rivalidade com o SD, este ano parece que estão a inverter os papeis para também permitir ao Raw levar a melhor no confronto.
AJ, Nakamura, Orton, Rusev, Ziggler ou Roode na Team Blue.
Será difícil encaixar o Owens e o Zayn aqui, apesar de serem as atracções atuais do roster.
.Aimar- Japanese Legend
- Número de Mensagens : 16221
Idade : 31
Localização : Vila Nova de Gaia, Porto
Emprego/lazer : Jogador profissional de Haxball
Data de inscrição : 10/01/2009
Re: Monday Night Raw - 23 de Outubro de 2017
[Tens de ter uma conta e sessão iniciada para poderes visualizar este link]Last night’s big show-closing angle on Monday Night Raw is generating fierce debate among fans. Was it a cool buzz-generating angle or utter nonsense, or is it too soon to tell?
For me, it’s utter nonsense. But the concept itself could have been done well. It’s too late to fix everything that was wrong with it last night, but not too late to try to plug some gaping logic holes.
It’s utter nonsense because you have babyfaces and heels fighting side by side for this imaginary “brand loyalty” that means nothing in the world WWE creates. Maybe Shane McMahon has “brand pride” or something, but what’s it based on? WWE talked a little bit about ratings when Smackdown closed in on Raw for a week or two, but otherwise there’s just no score-keeping in this regard.
Are wrestlers prideful of having “better matches” or putting on “better shows”? And how is that measured? And how are wrestler, who are typically selfish creatures acting in their own self interest to settle personal grudges and win matches and make more money, rewarded for having “better matches” or being part of “better shows”? They aren’t – not within the world WWE presents on TV.
Why would Bobby Roode suddenly fight side-by-side with Dolph Ziggler? Why would the babyfaces on Smackdown suddenly put aside everything their characters usually stand up for and partake in this mob attack, including an innocent backstage worker in a headset just going about his job? How can Becky Lynch for New Day ever stand up for fair play and honorable conduct when they were part of cheering on a gang style attack on Raw wrestlers without warning who were scattered around the backstage area, some nursing injuries (such as Jason Jordan)?
I’m in favor of the roster split, but not the unnecessary and illogical aspects of it. The Survivor Series as a concept featuring Raw vs. Smackdown wrestlers can work as an annual novelty, but it has to be handled with care, with attention paid to characters acting consistent with their moral compasses and constitutions that otherwise guide them throughout the other 11 months of the year and are the core reason we are motivated to root for or against them otherwise. Without that, an angle like this is just utter nonsense. Artistically, it’s offensive. Practically, it’s bad for business and undercuts what WWE does the other 11 months of the year.
The fact that Kevin Owens and Sami Zayn didn’t participate in an attack ordered by Shane McMahon is an acknowledgment that rivalries and grudges shouldn’t be set aside for mythical “brand pride.” But why are some grudges worth preserving and others not? Why do some heels have brand pride that rise above their disputes with babyface G.M. Shane McMahon, and not others? Worse of all, why would babyfaces act in such a way, including Shane, New Day, Shinsuke Nakamura, Chad Gable, Tye Dillinger, Bobby Roode, and Becky Lynch?
This doesn’t feel like some sort of culmination of a year of fighting for some collective cause. This feels like an annual fall booking stunt with a forced angle that makes no sense in any context.
Renato- Administrador
- Número de Mensagens : 29398
Idade : 28
Localização : Somewhere over the rainbow
Emprego/lazer : Estudante
Data de inscrição : 28/12/2008
» Monday Night Raw - 16 de Outubro de 2017
» Monday Night Raw - 30 de Outubro de 2017
» Monday Night Raw - 02 de Outubro de 2017
» Monday Night Raw - 29 de Outubro
FPW: Fórum de Pro Wrestling :: Wrestling :: WWE :: Shows :: Monday Night Raw
|
|